UBC-O, UNBC and UVic Professors Honoured for Using Their Research to Benefit the Community - April 12, 2012
Written by Robert Clift   
Thursday, 12 April 2012 07:15

UBC-O, UNBC and UVic Professors Honoured for Using Their Research to Benefit the Community
CUFA BC News Release
Thursday, April 12 2012

(Left to Right) Dr. Christopher Opio, Dr. Eric Sager, Dr. Cigdem Eskicioglu and Dr. David Mirhady

VANCOUVER -- An Engineering professor who is adapting European technology to process BC's municipal and industrial waste, an Ecosystem Science professor who is applying his academic work to create sustainable clean water resources in Northern Uganda, and a History professor who has spent his life connecting the study of history to contemporary Canadian issues received this year's CUFA BC Distinguished Academics Awards at a dinner in Vancouver last night.

UBC-Okanagan's Dr. Cigdem Eskicioglu received the 2012 Early in Career Award Sponsored by Scotiabank for her groundbreaking work on processing organic waste into energy (in the form of methane gas) and organic fertilizer. Her work diverts waste from landfills, protecting our environment and creating valuable resources.

UNBC's Dr. Christopher Opio received the 2012 Academic of the Year Award for his work establishing sustainable clean water resources in Northern Uganda. He founded the Northern Uganda Development Foundation in Prince George to support his work and to date has established 42 wells providing clean water to more than 50,000 people.

UVic's Dr. Eric Sager received the 2012 Paz Buttedahl Career Achievement Award for his lifelong commitment to connecting his historical research to contemporary issues. His is also dedicated to making his research available to the wider community, through newspaper articles, websites and public presentations.

These awards are presented annually by the Confederation of University Faculty Associations of BC (CUFA BC) to recognize outstanding faculty members at BC's public universities who use their research and scholarly work to benefit the general public.

"Dr. Eskicioglu's work on adapting European technology to process BC waste has led to many innovations and scientific advancements", said Dr. David Mirhady, President of CUFA BC. "Dr. Opio's commitment not only to establishing wells, but also to teaching communities how to manage and care for their water resources is truly inspiring. Dr. Sager's connection of the past to our present and future speaks volumes about his commitment to the wider community."

Sheryl MacKay, host of CBC Radio One's North by Northwest, emceed the awards dinner at the Law Courts Inn in Vancouver.

The CUFA BC Distinguished Academics Awards are in their eighteenth year and receive generous support from Scotiabank, Pacific Blue Cross, CBC Radio One, University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University, the University of Victoria, the University of Northern British Columbia, and Royal Roads University.

CUFA BC represents 4,600 university professors, instructors, academic librarians and other academic staff at the province's five doctoral universities -- SFU (Burnaby, Vancouver and Surrey campuses), UBC (Vancouver and Kelowna campuses), UNBC (Prince George, Terrace, Fort St. John and Quesnel campuses), UVic and Royal Roads University.

For further information, please contact Robert Clift, Executive Director of CUFA BC, at 604-817-1649.

Last Updated on Thursday, 12 April 2012 07:38
 
Profs Slam Government Over Bill 18 - March 29, 2012
Written by Robert Clift   
Thursday, 29 March 2012 08:51

VANCOUVER -- Legislative changes described by the provincial government as "good governance" have been slammed by the province's university professors as undermining democratic principles and stifling dissent.

"It doesn't matter how many times Advanced Education Minister Yamamoto says Bill 18 is about good governance, it doesn't make it true," said Robert Clift, Executive Director of the Confederation of University Faculty Associations of BC (CUFA BC). "Bill 18 is squarely aimed at bullying and intimidating the professors, students and staff members who serve on university and college boards of governors."

The professors' organization has been critical of Bill 18 since it was introduced last November. However, it attempted to work with the Ministry of Advanced Education to find ways to accomplish government's goals while preserving democratic principles and the tradition of shared university governance.

"We identified the weaknesses in the legislation and offered the government 'win-win' solutions," Clift explained. "But the government has instead chosen confrontation by proposing token amendments that are plainly insulting."

Bill 18 gives university and colleges boards of governors the ability to recommend the removal of a member of the board. The procedure is open to abuse since it effectively gives the power to the government appointees to oust elected students, professors and staff who don't toe the official line of the university or college.

"Bullying of students, professors and staff on boards of governors is nothing new," Clift said. "But it has been held in check by the fact that the elected board members were accountable to their constituents, not the government appointees."

"Bill 18 changes the rules of the game by giving the power to the government appointees to define what is in the best interests of the institution," Clift continued. "Under Bill 18, any elected board member who dissents from this party line can be given the boot without being given a fair hearing and with no right of appeal."

Government claims that it is proactively trying to prevent conflicts of interest. That explanation doesn't hold water according to the professors' group.

"Bill 18 focuses on potential conflicts of interest of professors and staff who, at most, comprise 20% of governing boards," Clift said. "The legislation does nothing to prevent conflicts of interest for the other 80% of board members."

"Moreover, it still remains possible for a senior university manager to get elected to a university board of governors as a faculty or staff representative, but then simply parrot the views of the president and vice presidents," Clift added. "If that's not a conflict of interest, I don't know what is."

The professors' organization vows to keep fighting Bill 18 even if it becomes law.

"Were not going to let government bully elected student, professor and staff representatives on boards of governors," Clift said. "We will support them and we will assemble dossiers on the government appointees in order to start rooting out their potential conflicts of interest."

"There is still time for government to defuse this situation," Clift added. "We hope that they will do so and revisit the 'win-win' solutions we proposed."

CUFA BC represents 4,600 university professors, instructors, academic librarians and other academic staff at UBC (Vancouver and Kelowna campuses), SFU (Burnaby, Vancouver and Surrey campuses), UVic, UNBC (Prince George, Terrace, Fort St. John and Quesnel campuses) and Royal Roads University.

- 30 -

For further information, please contact Robert Clift, CUFA BC Executive Director, at 604-817-1649 (cell) or This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

CUFA BC Statement Regarding Bill 18

CUFA BC Discussion Paper on Possible Amendments to Bill 18

Last Updated on Thursday, 29 March 2012 09:05
 
Statement Regarding Bill 18 - March 29, 2012
Written by Robert Clift   
Thursday, 29 March 2012 08:48

Statement by the Confederation of University Faculty Associations of BC
Regarding Bill 18 - Advanced Education Statutes Amendment Act, 2011
Robert F. Clift, Executive Director, CUFA BC
March 29, 2012

BC's university professors are profoundly disappointed that the Minister of Advanced Education has decided to move forward with Bill 18 - Advanced Education Statutes Amendment Act, 2011 - without making necessary, substantive amendments.

The governance provisions of Bill 18 are motivated by isolated incidents at a couple of institutions and not by any reasonable analysis of what is in the best interests of all of the province's public colleges, institutes and universities.

The government's contention that Bill 18 is meant to implement "good governance" practices doesn't stand up under scrutiny.

  • The legislation is contrary to the traditions of collegial governance that have served our public post-secondary educational institutions and our students well for over 40 years.
  • The legislation is poorly written and will result in litigation over ambiguities in wording.
  • The legislation makes no guarantees that the principles of natural justice will be employed in the ousting of members of boards of governors.
  • The legislation does nothing to address potential conflicts of interest for 80% of the members of boards of governors.
  • The legislation does nothing to prevent senior university managers from being elected to boards of governors under the guise of faculty or staff representatives.

At the end of December, we provided the Minster of Advanced Education with draft wording that would have addressed all of these shortcomings.

Rather than dealing with the myriad of substantive issues we and others have raised, the Minister has instead proposed amendments to Bill 18 that can only be viewed as token in nature.

We have little choice but to conclude on the basis of the evidence available to us that the governance provisions of Bill 18 are primarily intended to undermine the role of students, staff and faculty members on boards of governors.

Bill 18 provides the government appointees on the boards with the tools to bully and intimidate the elected members of boards who stand up for high-quality education in the face of administrative and fiscal expediency.

Despite the government's assertions, Bill 18 has little to do with conflict of interest and good governance and everything do with stifling dissent. In this respect it is an affront to everything universities stand for.

When this legislation was first introduced last November, not one single president of a public university, college or institute publicly indicated a need for these amendments. We have not heard a single student association, staff union or faculty association indicate their support for these provisions.

It may well be that some appointed members of boards of governors have privately indicated their support for the Minister's proposals, but to the best of our knowledge, none have done so publicly.

So, the Minister has chosen a sledgehammer to kill a fruit fly. The Minister has made proposals that have no public support from the public post-secondary education sector. The Minister has made proposals whose only public support is from her caucus colleagues. There is still an opportunity for the Minister to make substantive amendments to the legislation or to withdraw the offending portions entirely.

If, however, this Act passes as currently proposed by the Minister, CUFA BC will work with other post-secondary education organizations to monitor the appointed members of boards of governors - the other 80% of board members - for the purpose of determining if they are in real or potential conflicts of interest due to their business, professional, volunteer or personal activities.

We will also work to support individual members of boards of governors against bullying and censorship. We will support those board members who are working in the best interests of the students and of the community of scholars in the face of administrative and governmental intimidation.

This issue will not go away. It strikes at the heart of the universities and cannot be tolerated.



For further information or comment, please contact Robert Clift, Executive Director of CUFA BC, at 604-817-1649 (cell) or This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Last Updated on Thursday, 29 March 2012 08:59
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 4
RocketTheme Joomla Templates